This is an overview of defamation

 If the comment is made as a mere opinion, it may not be a cause of action for defamation. A malicious imputation through action is covered under the wing of slander. If for example the imputation is done about a controversy involving a public official, then the statement is not actionable. This is an overview of defamation as it can apply to personal injury law cases. Other states revised, modified and altered this common law-originated concept such that cause of actions, defenses and elements greatly differ in one place to another. This includes factual reports without any comment or remarks. Sullivan, the US Supreme Court decided that if a public official would be moving to file charges of defamation, he or she must prove that the statement is done maliciously or with gross neglect of what is true. Third, publisher's negligence, if it involves something that concerns the public.Opinion may also come as a defense..Both kinds of defamation have different elements.

Most of the time, since cases of this kind usually involve people in the limelight, filing a defamation lawsuit is not always wise on the part of the person impugned. But generally, for defamation to exist, the following must concur. This is because the defamatory statement, even if untrue, would just become more publicized. You often hear and read this in the news. Second, such defamatory statement should have been published. First, there should be malicious and false imputation. Defamation may be committed either through writing or oral representation.In most states and jurisdiction, defamation is the malicious imputation and damage to one's reputation. Best example is the speeches of members of congress done during sessions.In one case, New York v. There are other jurisdiction that while the statement is a clear opinion, if it was made based on a false supposition or fact, it becomes actionable for defamation. The former is known as libel while the latter is called as slander or oral defamation. Another defense is the privilege communication. Qualified privilege, on the other hand, would become actionable only as a defense depending on the circumstances.

One of the forefront defenses in cases of defamation is truth. In most jurisdictions, there is such a thing as absolute privilege where everything that will be Automotive Injection Molding Company said or imputed will never be actionable in courts. As to whether or not it is an opinion would depend on the circumstances.Private communications may not also be actionable in most jurisdictions. Oftentimes it involves celebrities, television personalities or known figures in a grand superb conflict with another of the same stature. And finally, there should have been damage to the person imputed.Laws on defamation vary across jurisdictions. If you can show that what has been imputed is true, you may be cleared of the charges. Many have enacted statutes to strengthen the law on defamation. 

There are even some that allow retraction or apology to thwart full-blown litigation for defamation.One of the more known concepts in personal injury law is the law on defamation. For purposes of defamation, publication means that the imputation has been told to or been heard or read by at least a third person. Note that publication here is not given its usual meaning.Defamation, in law, is a general and broad term to include all false statements directed to someone, who then bears damage because of such imputation. But there are jurisdictions that accept mental anguish for defamation, even if actual damage to reputation is absent.Comments on matters of public concern are also a defense for liable or slander as the case may be. This includes communication between husband and wife, a patient and a doctor, a client and his attorney and so on and so forth. This is known as slander by deed